? orus casino? bodog? ruleta? luckia? betano? sportium? spin casino? stakes? 3 reyes? 888? lottoland? coolbet? 777 casino? gana777? betfair? bwin? yak casino? ivy casino? oddschecker? red casino? netbet? william hill? vip casino? rey casino? marathonbet? dafabet? sol casino? 1bet? winland? bet777? parimatch? 18bet? 888casino? campobet? mostbet? ganabet? rushbet? betcris? betsson? lucky? novibet? winner? winpot? betmaster? betmexico? cancun? playcity? strendus? pokerstars? codere? caliente? fun88? bbrbet? 1win? 10bet? betway? pin up? spinbet? 7cslot? pickwin? spin bet? mr fortune? w88? pragmatic? gamdom? crasher? jojobet? betmex? bcasino? foliatti? winner mx? bets 10? big bola? bet master? inbet? 7slots? lucky day? m777? mexplay? luckydays? bet caliente? 1x? plinko

News detail

WORKING PAPER | Pricing Mechanisms for Multi-Indication Drugs
News | 24 November 2025 WORKING PAPER | Pricing Mechanisms for Multi-Indication Drugs

NEW WORKING PAPER!

A new working paper has just been released:
“Pricing Mechanisms for Multi-Indication Drugs”

 

✍️ Authors: Pedro Pita Barros, Giovanni Righetti and Luís Sá

 

Multi-indication drugs – the same drug used across different diseases, lines of therapy or treatment phases – create major challenges for pricing, access and incentives for innovation. This paper proposes a unified framework to understand how pricing rules interact with clinical trial design and with manufacturers’ strategic choices of which patients to include.

 

🔍 Key insights:
• The authors develop a formal model in which the manufacturer chooses the clinically eligible patient populations for each indication, trading off higher demand against lower expected therapeutic benefit and lower feasible prices.
• They identify three pricing mechanisms that align profit maximisation with total therapeutic benefit maximization: indication-based pricing, population-weighted uniform pricing, and two-part tariffs.
• These mechanisms can emerge endogenously from Nash bargaining between payers and manufacturers, highlighting that bargaining power – not just HTA – is crucial for payers to retain part of the value created.
• When indications are launched sequentially, constraints on price increases distort which patients are included in clinical trials - rationalising the “narrow, high-benefit first; broader, lower-benefit later” launch patterns observed empirically and raising important policy questions for pricing rules and innovation incentives.

 

🎯 Bottom line: Choosing how we price multi-indication drugs is not just a technical detail – it shapes who gets treated, how much health is generated and where pharmaceutical innovation is directed.

 

🔗 Read the full working paper here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5374679

What's happening